Translate

Monday, July 13, 2020

The Digital Divide in the Age of Covid


                               The Digital Divide in the Age of Covid
By Albert B. Kelly

In the past, the struggle for equality and access might have been focused in certain areas whether education, jobs, health care, or finance, to name just a few. Up until the Covid-19 pandemic, the question of achieving progress in any one of these realms was considered largely in isolation from the others so that solving issues of access and equality in education for example, was separate and distinct from how to do so in health care, or employment, or finance.

One thing the pandemic has revealed is that providing a level playing field in any one of these pressing areas has to start with providing solid, affordable, and consistent internet access to all residents regardless of where they live or how much they earn. When the pandemic struck there was a mad scramble to shift as much as possible online whether working remotely from home, teaching, telemedicine, banking, or ordering groceries.

That’s fine and good if you have high speed internet and all the devices needed to survive and even thrive online, but what if you’re at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder or you live in a rural area where the internet providers have decided it is simply not profitable to build out the infrastructure? When the pandemic hit here locally, the school system did a good job of providing tablets to our students. The problem is that many hundreds don’t have internet access in their homes.  

I recall an article from a couple of years ago by Colleen O’dea for NJ Spotlight that reviewed data from the American Community Survey and at that time, she noted that less than 60% of households could go online in Bridgeton, Salem, Camden, Trenton, and Perth Amboy. This was in comparison to some 95% of households able to go online in 17 of the wealthier suburbs in central and northern New Jersey.

Things have not improved all that much since then. As we speak, there are 1,983 households in Bridgeton without internet access which represents 31% of our communities’ total number of households. Of Cumberland County’s roughly 50,000 households, 15% do not have internet access which is highest among New Jersey’s counties. As for the reasons why, some of it centers on geography while some of it is about poverty. As for the statewide number, approximately 10% of New Jersey’s households lack internet access.

But before we can consider specific solutions, it may well be necessary to adjust our perspectives about the digital divide and internet access, especially when it comes to the social safety net. We might not have a problem using taxpayer monies to provide income-eligible families with WIC benefits (cereal, fruit or vegetable juice, eggs, milk, cheese, and peanut butter), but suggest that the safety net include high speed internet and you’re likely to have one hell of a fight on your hands.

Yet one of the biggest problems for many low-income families trying help their school-age children keep pace is internet access and without that, no matter how good schools are with providing the technology for students to take home, there is no ability to do remote instruction. As for the internet providers, they’ll provide some type of free introductory period, but once that expires and the monthly fees kick in, families either have to add that cost to their monthly burden or lose the service.

Specific programs and solutions aside, my point is that we will have to fundamentally shift our thinking about internet access and all things digital. Rather than characterizing internet access as a luxury used primarily for looking at cat videos and shopping on Amazon, using the pandemic as a backdrop, we need to acknowledge it as essential in the same way that we now consider plumbing, heat and electric as essential with minimum standards to be met.

Not for nothing- but during the pandemic, many doctors wouldn’t see patients’ in the office, but instead would set up telehealth visits online. How many didn’t get the help they needed because they couldn’t access a doctor online? Beyond that, how did this gap in care for some impact the health of the broader community? As we go forward from here, whether it involves employment, interacting with the court system, or engaging a host of services public and private, more and more of it will be online. Unless we address the digital divide made obvious by the pandemic, inequality will increase dramatically.