Translate

Sunday, July 26, 2020

In Lieu of a New Jail


                                        In Lieu of a New Jail
By Albert B. Kelly

I wasn’t sure how to feel when the County announced that it was re-evaluating plans to move ahead with building a new county correctional facility in Bridgeton. Part of my mixed emotions had to do with the fact that the existing facility is long past its useful life- something our County officials readily acknowledge.

Part of my reaction had to do with where the existing jail is located, which is right smack in the center of the community and I can think of several more beneficial uses for that slice of geography than a jail facility. That area has redevelopment potential that includes the adjacent court facilities and it would certainly benefit the community from a revitalization standpoint.

But for all of that, I also understand caution on the part of County officials given the changing numbers as it relates to inmates. Regardless of the reasons, bail reform, changing police practices, lower crime figures, or some combination of these, it certainly makes sense to proceed with caution when it comes to spending taxpayer dollars on such facilities. My point is that I find no fault with proceeding carefully given the current landscape.

But even acknowledging the need for caution and taking a conservative approach, I can’t help but wonder if we’re missing an opportunity here to do something far more beneficial and productive than what we might commonly expect from a traditional county jail. What I mean to say is that we might well be at a moment where we can re-think what we’re doing in such a way that we move beyond merely treating the symptom (i.e. crime) to dealing more with some root causes.

We know for example that a fair number of those who end up in our jails and prisons suffer from some type of mental health issue- they can be scary but they’re not necessarily criminals, at least not at the outset. Yet, calling police is mostly what’s available to us when we encounter individuals suffering from some type of mental illness and the end of that is often jail.

In the same way that we have few options for those suffering from mental illnesses, we also have few options for the homeless. We have a shelter located on the outskirts so we don’t have to have them too close, but it’s limited in who it can help and how it can help. That means a chronic subset of disorderly homeless that we can no longer just shuffle them back and forth to jail.

We also have a portion of our population suffering from drug and alcohol addiction, often combined with mental illness. Like the homeless, there are limited options available in terms of programs and supports for those hoping to end the cycle of addiction whether as an outpatient or in a facility. And like the homeless, we no longer have the option of shuffling them back and forth to jail.

We have our incorrigible criminals to be sure, but we have far more on the edge of criminality who mostly suffers from mental illness, homelessness, addiction or some combination of these and the problems only grow worse. People talk about inequality and it’s real. The connection they fail to make is that inequality, left unaddressed and unattended, often looks like the scary homeless woman muttering to herself on the street corner, or the menacing guy yelling at cars and arguing with demons only he can see.

People talk about police brutality, use-of-force, and defunding the police. It’s a fair and valid conversation and one that is long overdue, but the part that doesn’t get much play is the part where police are forced to deal with things that are better left to social workers, mental health practitioners, and addiction specialists. To a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail- we shouldn’t ask police to deal with things outside of their training.
So we don’t need a shiny new traditional jail but that’s not because the problems are less, it’s because we’re criminalizing homelessness, poverty, mental illness, and addiction a hell of a lot less. In lieu of a new jail, I would argue that we need a hybrid facility that combines mental health services, addiction treatment, social services, and workforce development. More than anything else, a facility focused in these areas would do more to take chronic problems off our streets than anything a traditional jail might offer.